May 17, 2013

United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Chesapeake Bay Protection

Read more about the impacts of the US EPA's Chesapeake Bay Act on the built environment, especially the TMDL aspect of the Act.

In conjunction with the federal Clean Water Act of 1972 (CWA) and the Water Quality Act of 1987 (WQA), the six Chesapeake Bay watershed states and the District of Columbia were required to identify waterways that did not meet water quality standards. In June 2000, the Bay watershed partners signed the voluntary Chesapeake 2000 Agreement to identify action items and commitments required to achieve water quality standards for the Chesapeake Bay. With this agreement came the understanding that if these voluntary actions were not fully successful in achieving the required water quality standards, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would step in and prepare and complete a multi-jurisdictional Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the Chesapeake Bay. A TMDL dictates the maximum amount of pollution that the receiving waters can withstand while still meeting federal water quality standards. In May 2009, President Obama issued Executive Order 13508: Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration that grants the EPA the authority to implement the TDML with a goal of restoring the Chesapeake Bay to adequate water quality standards by 2025. At the present time, EPA is actively working with the seven jurisdictions within the Chesapeake Bay watershed (Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Delaware, and the District of Columbia) in crafting the TMDL, which will be implemented by December 31, 2010.Chesapeake Bay TMDLThe purpose of the TMDL is to restore water quality standards for dissolved oxygen, clarity, chlorophyll-a, and submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) to tidal segments of the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries and embayments that are currently listed as impaired under the criteria outlined in Section 303(d) of the CWA due to the pollutants of excess nutrients and sediment from the watershed runoff. The source of these pollutants can include discharge from the end of a wastewater pipe (point sources) or from regulated stormwater runoff, agricultural sources, septic systems, surface runoff, and groundwater flows (non-point sources). The TMDL outlines maximum specific target loadings, or allocations, of nutrients and sediment allowed to be delivered to the Chesapeake Bay from all sources throughout the watershed, including atmospheric deposition of nitrogen to the subject waterways. It is essentially a “pollution diet” for the Chesapeake Bay. The EPA has stipulated that “reasonable assurance of implementation” will be made as part of this TMDL. “Reasonable assurance” is a demonstration by the six states and the District of Columbia that the determined goals for load reductions, as set forth by the TMDL going into effect at the end of this year, can be reasonably achieved through each state’s and the District’s respective commitments, policies, and resources.Process of Developing the TMDLStep one of developing the TMDL was identifying which waterways were impaired—thus not meeting water quality standards. This step involved assessing the implementation of water monitoring and the establishment of an overall water model analysis. If a waterway segment was considered unimpaired, then the water model analysis determined how much additional pollutant loading the waterway could assimilate without violating water quality standards. Upon completion of the water model analysis, a maximum pollutant load (TMDL) is established and allocated amongst point and non-point sources throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed.As part of the “reasonable assurance of implementation” demonstration, each state within the Bay watershed and the District of Columbia is currently establishing their own respective Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs). The WIPs contribute to a fair and transparent wasteload and load allocation process for nutrients and sediment (i.e. phosphorus, nitrogen, sediment) among various pollution source sectors and in different geographical areas. The WIP development process consists of three distinct phases. Phase 1 WIP (Draft) for each state and the District of Columbia is currently available on Maryland Department of the Environment’s website for review. The Phase 1 WIP outlines a description of the authorities, actions, and possible control measures, which may be implemented to achieve point source and non-point source target loads and TMDL allocations. In the future, the final Phase 1 WIP will include information for the permit writers to issue future permits for point sources that are consistent with wasteload allocations (WLAs). Phase 1 WIPs will establish a tracking program to verify if control practices are effective and will create certain specific jurisdiction milestones (2 year increments). These milestones will describe the reduction of loading required to meet the interim target TMDL goals (60% total reduction by 2017 based on current loads / 70% for Maryland) and final TMDL goals (100% reduction by 2025 / 2020 for Maryland). The jurisdictions will factor for their respective future growth and may distribute allocations accordingly based on their planned growth. Currently, Phase 1 WIPs are under a public comment period through November 8, 2010, with final Phase 1 WIPs being submitted to the EPA on November 29, 2010. The EPA shall establish the final TMDL on December 31, 2010.The Chesapeake Bay watershed states and District of Columbia will develop draft Phase 2 WIPs, which will be submitted in draft and final formats on June 1, 2011 and November 1, 2011 respectively. The Phase 2 WIPs shall further distribute non-point source finer-scale load allocations and any aggregate point source wasteload allocations into smaller geographic areas, waterways, or sources where appropriate. The states shall coordinate with the agencies at the local level (ie: County, City, Soil Conservation Districts) to develop more specific nutrient and sediment target loads. The Phase 2 WIPs shall identify specific controls and practices that will be implemented no later than 2017 to meet the interim TMDL water quality goals.Phase 3 WIPs from the Bay watershed states and District of Columbia will then be submitted to the EPA in 2017 with further refined control measures, based upon the outcome of the 2017 interim TMDL milestone assessment, to implement controls between 2018 and 2025 to achieve TMDL water quality standards.Impacts on Land Development ProjectsCurrently, the Chesapeake Bay watershed states and the District of Columbia are working to establish methods for controlling nutrient and sediment loadings into the Chesapeake Bay as part of the WIP process. It is evident that due to the pending TMDL, changes to the current permitting processes are forthcoming and will impact the land development community. Although the overall nutrient and sediment load impacts to the Chesapeake Bay from “new” construction is minimal in comparison to the impacts associated with agriculture and existing urban/suburban development runoff (a large portion of which was developed prior to the mid-1980s before stormwater management regulations and sediment and erosion control regulations), loading from new construction and redevelopment projects can be easily enforced through the issuance of permits. It seems apparent that permitting changes (i.e. stormwater management, sediment and erosion control, NPDES) associated with achieving the target goals for the TMDL may have some significant effects on land development projects. These effects may include: New restrictions on nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment discharges reflected on all new NPDES permits within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Establishing a goal of “no net discharge” for new development projects through the implementation of low impact development (LID) or environmental site design (ESD) techniques, which may increase construction costs. Project requirements stating open space needs to be increased and/or parking areas decreased respectively, due to LID/ESD stormwater implementation that may have negative impact on the allowable densities for projects as more physical land area is being devoted to stormwater management. Redevelopment Projects to require between 30% to 50% retrofitting for stormwater management to reduce impacts from existing impervious surfaces not currently being managed. The WIPs have not finalized the specific percentage requirement; however, it will be determined before the end of 2010. This requirement will further increase construction/development costs for redevelopment projects within urban areas. Post construction monitoring/testing of site discharged runoff to determine pollutant levels of sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus. These pollutant levels will be evaluated against the required pollutant allocations established by the issued permit. Sediment and Erosion Control requirements for limits on the maximum allowable areas of disturbance, for providing vegetative buffers outside of silt fences/limits of disturbance, and for shortening timeframes for the implementation of stabilization of disturbed areas. Proposing that all new and failed residential septic systems within 1,000 feet of tidal waters install denitrification systems (Cost: $8K to $11K per system). Strengthening the requirements of the Forest Conservation regulations to achieve a “No Net Loss of Forest” through utilization of more forest mitigation banks and eliminating the fee-in-lieu option. Reduction in the usage of commercial fertilizers found in urban/suburban runoff. An increase in engineering design budgets for projects associated with stormwater management and sediment and erosion control. An increase in the overall time process associated with obtaining permits through the regulatory agencies. An increase in overall construction costs with regard to stormwater management and sediment and erosion control. An increase in stormwater management maintenance costs, which most likely will be passed to the commercial user and/or residential user (HOA).How Soltesz Can AssistSoltesz has been actively following the process of the EPA’s establishment of the upcoming Chesapeake Bay TMDL. Soltesz’s staff is well-versed with the imminent changes to the land development process that will be approaching in the next several months, from the institution of the Watershed Implementation Plans to the establishment of the final TMDL. Soltesz has been and remains in the forefront with regards to the revisions of the latest stormwater management, sediment and erosion control, and NPDES regulations and has extensive knowledge on how these regulations may be applied to the new Chesapeake Bay TMDL and, ultimately, how these regulations may affect your projects. Our vast knowledge of these latest changes in regulations, combined with our distinguished reputation as a consulting leader in site/civil design, allows Soltesz the ability to offer exceptional professional services to our clients while meeting their respective project goals on time and within budget.

No items found.

Other News

Clear All Filters
News
Soltesz Ranked #9 Among Largest Landscape Architecture Firms in Greater Washington
March 26, 2026
The Washington Business Journal ranks Soltesz ranks #9 among the top landscape architecture firms in the DC Metro Area. Learn more about our integrated landscape design approach.
soltesz top landscape architecture firm in washington dc metro area

Landscape Architecture Firms in Washington DC: Soltesz Ranked Among Top 10

Soltesz has been ranked #9 among the largest landscape architecture firms in the Greater Washington, D.C. region by the Washington Business Journal, based on 2025 metro-area landscape architecture revenue.

This recognition reflects the continued growth of our landscape architecture practice and the strength of our integrated approach—bringing together landscape architecture, civil engineering, and planning to deliver cohesive, high-performing environments across the region.

Soltesz ranked #9 based on annual revenue in the field reporting $1.95 million in metro-area landscape architecture revenue in 2025.

Full-Service Landscape Architecture, Planning and Site Design in Maryland and the DC Metro Area

At Soltesz, landscape architecture is fully integrated into our broader project delivery model—from early feasibility and entitlement through final construction. Our team combines illustrative design, site planning, and technical expertise to create spaces that are both functional and enduring.

Our approach emphasizes:

  • Sustainable, energy-efficient design solutions
  • Safe, accessible environments for users and communities
  • Cost-effective planning that minimizes long-term maintenance
  • Seamless coordination across disciplines for efficient project delivery

From streetscapes and recreational amenities to large-scale development projects, our landscape architecture team helps shape environments that support both project performance and community experience.

Learn more about our landscape architecture services and view select projects here.

soltesz greater dc largest landscape architecture firm

What Being Ranked A Top Ten Landscape Architecture Firm Says About Our Team

This ranking is a testament to the expertise and dedication of our team, as well as the trust our clients and partners place in us to deliver thoughtful, high-quality solutions.

We’re proud of the work behind this recognition and the role our landscape architecture team plays in shaping the built environment across the region. View the full list here.

Read More
News
Soltesz Hosts Announcement of Job Creation Project ZTA
March 11, 2026
Soltesz was honored to host Montgomery County Council President Natali Fani-González, the Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation, and several chambers of commerce for the announcement of the Job Creation Project ZTA (ZTA 26-05).

Soltesz was honored to host Montgomery County Council President Natali Fani-González, the Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation (MCEDC), and the Montgomery County Chamber of Commerce to announce the Job Creation Project ZTA (ZTA 26-05).

The proposed zoning measure aims to attract major employers in strategic job-creation projects, and strengthen Montgomery County’s economic industries, spur new job creation projects, and strengthen Montgomery County’s economic competitiveness.

ZTA26-05 would establish an expedited and predictable development approval process for projects that either align with strategic industries identified in the County’s Economic Development Strategic Plan or generate at least 200 jobs. Qualifying projects would be guaranteed a Planning Board hearing within 60 days of application acceptance — significantly reducing review timelines and increasing certainty for employers making investment decisions.

“We must remain laser-focused on attracting new jobs and private-sector investment to the County, and that means evaluating and improving every touch point between county government and businesses,” said Council President and Economic Development Committee Chair Fani-González. “If you want to make significant business investments in Montgomery County to help grow economic opportunities for our residents, we are ready to partner with you to get your project to market faster, cheaper, and more predictably.”

Remarks were also delivered by Jared Smith, President & CEO of MCEDC, who emphasized the importance of strengthening the County's ability to attract, retain, and grow businesses while expanding economic opportunity.

“With this legislation, Montgomery County is demonstrating that we are open for business,” said James A. Soltesz, President & CEO of Soltesz. “By expanding the expedited approval process to support the growth of existing companies and attract new businesses, we are cutting months from project timelines and fostering a more predictable, business-friendly environment that drives economic growth and job creation.”

As a firm that has served Montgomery County for more than 45 years, Soltesz understands how regulatory clarity and coordinated agency review directly impact project delivery and long-term economic success.

Read the full press release from the Office of Council President Natali Fani-González.

View the Montgomery County Council News Briefing here.

Read More
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Newsletter Signup

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.